public inbox for git-commits@fedoraproject.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [rpms/gdb] gdb-17.2-rebase-f44: Fix aarch64 build problem (RHBZ 1932645, Kevin Buettner).
@ 2026-06-28  0:00 Kevin Buettner
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Kevin Buettner @ 2026-06-28  0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: git-commits

A new commit has been pushed.

Repo   : rpms/gdb
Branch : gdb-17.2-rebase-f44
Commit : f923d71406e436bf82e130bf6e4dc95f1828e09e
Author : Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Date   : 2021-02-24T14:25:14-07:00
Stats  : +97/-7 in 6 file(s)
URL    : https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gdb/c/f923d71406e436bf82e130bf6e4dc95f1828e09e?branch=gdb-17.2-rebase-f44

Log:
Fix aarch64 build problem (RHBZ 1932645, Kevin Buettner).

---
diff --git a/_gdb.spec.Patch.include b/_gdb.spec.Patch.include
index f4a4002..a9fb5aa 100644
--- a/_gdb.spec.Patch.include
+++ b/_gdb.spec.Patch.include
@@ -406,3 +406,7 @@ Patch099: gdb-rhbz1912985-libstdc++-assert.patch
 # Backport fix for rawhide build error (RH BZ 1930528).
 Patch100: gdb-rhbz1930528-fix-gnulib-build-error.patch
 
+# [aarch64] Backport fix for aarch64-linux-hw-point.c build problem
+# (RH BZ 1932645).
+Patch101: gdb-rhbz1932645-aarch64-ptrace-header-order.patch
+

diff --git a/_gdb.spec.patch.include b/_gdb.spec.patch.include
index fd3cf02..202a5cc 100644
--- a/_gdb.spec.patch.include
+++ b/_gdb.spec.patch.include
@@ -98,3 +98,4 @@
 %patch098 -p1
 %patch099 -p1
 %patch100 -p1
+%patch101 -p1

diff --git a/_patch_order b/_patch_order
index 4e243cf..fa31778 100644
--- a/_patch_order
+++ b/_patch_order
@@ -98,3 +98,4 @@ gdb-rhbz1553104-s390x-arch12-test.patch
 gdb-rhbz1905996-fix-off-by-one-error-in-ada_fold_name.patch
 gdb-rhbz1912985-libstdc++-assert.patch
 gdb-rhbz1930528-fix-gnulib-build-error.patch
+gdb-rhbz1932645-aarch64-ptrace-header-order.patch

diff --git a/gdb-rhbz1932645-aarch64-ptrace-header-order.patch b/gdb-rhbz1932645-aarch64-ptrace-header-order.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4f961a6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gdb-rhbz1932645-aarch64-ptrace-header-order.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+From FEDORA_PATCHES Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
+Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 13:19:08 -0700
+Subject: gdb-rhbz1932645-aarch64-ptrace-header-order.patch
+
+;; [aarch64] Backport fix for aarch64-linux-hw-point.c build problem
+;; (RH BZ 1932645).
+
+Fix aarch64-linux-hw-point.c build problem
+
+Due to a recent glibc header file change, the file
+nat/aarch64-linux-hw-point.c no longer builds on Fedora rawhide.
+
+An enum for PTRACE_SYSEMU is now provided by <sys/ptrace.h>.  In the
+past, PTRACE_SYSEMU was defined only in <asm/ptrace.h>.  This is
+what it looks like...
+
+In <asm/ptrace.h>:
+
+ #define PTRACE_SYSEMU		  31
+
+In <sys/ptrace.h>:
+
+enum __ptrace_request
+{
+  ...
+  PTRACE_SYSEMU = 31,
+ #define PT_SYSEMU PTRACE_SYSEMU
+
+  ...
+}
+
+When <asm/ptrace.h> and <sys/ptrace.h> are both included in a source
+file, we run into the following build problem when the former is
+included before the latter:
+
+In file included from nat/aarch64-linux-hw-point.c:26:
+/usr/include/sys/ptrace.h:86:3: error: expected identifier before numeric constant
+   86 |   PTRACE_SYSEMU = 31,
+      |   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+(There are more errors after this one too.)
+
+The file builds without error when <asm/ptrace.h> is included after
+<sys/ptrace.h>.  I found that this is already done in
+nat/aarch64-sve-linux-ptrace.h (which is included by
+nat/aarch64-linux-ptrace.c).
+
+I've tested this change on Fedora rawhide and Fedora 33, both
+running on an aarch64 machine.
+
+gdb/ChangeLog:
+
+	* nat/aarch64-linux-hw-point.c: Include <asm/ptrace.h> after
+	<sys/ptrace.h>.
+
+diff --git a/gdb/nat/aarch64-linux-hw-point.c b/gdb/nat/aarch64-linux-hw-point.c
+--- a/gdb/nat/aarch64-linux-hw-point.c
++++ b/gdb/nat/aarch64-linux-hw-point.c
+@@ -23,8 +23,8 @@
+ #include "aarch64-linux-hw-point.h"
+ 
+ #include <sys/uio.h>
+-#include <asm/ptrace.h>
+ #include <sys/ptrace.h>
++#include <asm/ptrace.h>
+ #include <elf.h>
+ 
+ /* Number of hardware breakpoints/watchpoints the target supports.

diff --git a/gdb-vla-intel-fortran-vla-strings.patch b/gdb-vla-intel-fortran-vla-strings.patch
index 0682b02..1e48ee8 100644
--- a/gdb-vla-intel-fortran-vla-strings.patch
+++ b/gdb-vla-intel-fortran-vla-strings.patch
@@ -45,14 +45,18 @@ diff --git a/gdb/NEWS b/gdb/NEWS
 diff --git a/gdb/c-valprint.c b/gdb/c-valprint.c
 --- a/gdb/c-valprint.c
 +++ b/gdb/c-valprint.c
-@@ -572,6 +572,24 @@ c_value_print (struct value *val, struct ui_file *stream,
+@@ -572,6 +572,28 @@ c_value_print (struct value *val, struct ui_file *stream,
        else
  	{
  	  /* normal case */
 +	  if (type->code () == TYPE_CODE_PTR
 +	      && 1 == is_dynamic_type (type))
 +	    {
-+	      CORE_ADDR addr = value_as_address (val);
++	      CORE_ADDR addr;
++	      if (NULL != TYPE_DATA_LOCATION (TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (type)))
++		addr = value_address (val);
++	      else
++		addr = value_as_address (val);
 +
 +	      /* We resolve the target-type only when the
 +	         pointer is associated.  */
@@ -1005,7 +1009,7 @@ diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.fortran/vla-value.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.fortran
 diff --git a/gdb/typeprint.c b/gdb/typeprint.c
 --- a/gdb/typeprint.c
 +++ b/gdb/typeprint.c
-@@ -565,6 +565,21 @@ whatis_exp (const char *exp, int show)
+@@ -565,6 +565,25 @@ whatis_exp (const char *exp, int show)
        printf_filtered (" */\n");    
      }
  
@@ -1016,7 +1020,11 @@ diff --git a/gdb/typeprint.c b/gdb/typeprint.c
 +  if (type->code () == TYPE_CODE_PTR
 +      && is_dynamic_type (type) == 1)
 +    {
-+      CORE_ADDR addr = value_as_address (val);
++      CORE_ADDR addr;
++      if (NULL != TYPE_DATA_LOCATION (TYPE_TARGET_TYPE(type)))
++	addr = value_address (val);
++      else
++	addr = value_as_address (val);
 +
 +      if (addr != 0
 +	  && type_not_associated (type) == 0)
@@ -1030,15 +1038,19 @@ diff --git a/gdb/typeprint.c b/gdb/typeprint.c
 diff --git a/gdb/valops.c b/gdb/valops.c
 --- a/gdb/valops.c
 +++ b/gdb/valops.c
-@@ -1553,6 +1553,15 @@ value_ind (struct value *arg1)
+@@ -1553,6 +1553,19 @@ value_ind (struct value *arg1)
    if (base_type->code () == TYPE_CODE_PTR)
      {
        struct type *enc_type;
++      CORE_ADDR addr;
 +
 +      if (type_not_associated (base_type))
 +        error (_("Attempt to take contents of a not associated pointer."));
 +
-+      CORE_ADDR addr = value_as_address (arg1);
++      if (NULL != TYPE_DATA_LOCATION (TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (base_type)))
++	addr = value_address (arg1);
++      else
++	addr = value_as_address (arg1);
 +
 +      if (addr != 0)
 +	TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (base_type) =

diff --git a/gdb.spec b/gdb.spec
index 82386e2..5ba6149 100644
--- a/gdb.spec
+++ b/gdb.spec
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ Version: 10.1
 
 # The release always contains a leading reserved number, start it at 1.
 # `upstream' is not a part of `name' to stay fully rpm dependencies compatible for the testing.
-Release: 8%{?dist}
+Release: 9%{?dist}
 
 License: GPLv3+ and GPLv3+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ and GPLv2+ with exceptions and GPL+ and LGPLv2+ and LGPLv3+ and BSD and Public Domain and GFDL
 # Do not provide URL for snapshots as the file lasts there only for 2 days.
@@ -1195,6 +1195,9 @@ fi
 %endif
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Feb 24 2021 Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> - 10.1-9
+- Fix aarch64 build problem (RHBZ 1932645, Kevin Buettner).
+
 * Fri Feb 19 2021 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> - 10.1-8
 - Fix gdb-vla-intel-fortran-vla-strings.patch for compatiblity with GraalVM.
 

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2026-06-28  0:00 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-28  0:00 [rpms/gdb] gdb-17.2-rebase-f44: Fix aarch64 build problem (RHBZ 1932645, Kevin Buettner) Kevin Buettner

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox