public inbox for git-commits@fedoraproject.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
To: git-commits@fedoraproject.org
Subject: [tests/selinux] pr775-checkpolicy-revdeps: kernel/selinux-testsuite: handle BPF restrictions better
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 13:17:48 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178913266891.1.15757820566324728344.tests-selinux-a3e35f88ec4e@fedoraproject.org> (raw)
A new commit has been pushed.
Repo : tests/selinux
Branch : pr775-checkpolicy-revdeps
Commit : a3e35f88ec4e57f7afc5f267e465ddcb8e83d198
Author : Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
Date : 2020-03-09T14:29:00+01:00
Stats : +10/-3 in 1 file(s)
URL : https://src.fedoraproject.org/tests/selinux/c/a3e35f88ec4e57f7afc5f267e465ddcb8e83d198?branch=pr775-checkpolicy-revdeps
Log:
kernel/selinux-testsuite: handle BPF restrictions better
On RHEL and non-x86_64 Fedora kernels, the kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled
sysctl is enabled by default (and at least on RHEL/ARK it cannot be
changed). Instead of trying to disable the BPF subtest completely on
these kernels (which is incomplete since CKI tests ARK kernels on
Fedora), add the sys_admin capability to the BPF test domains to make
the test work on these kernels as well.
We also need to install libbpf-devel separately from CRB on RHEL, since
it's not shipped in BaseOS.
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
---
diff --git a/kernel/selinux-testsuite/runtest.sh b/kernel/selinux-testsuite/runtest.sh
index bc843c8..4627405 100755
--- a/kernel/selinux-testsuite/runtest.sh
+++ b/kernel/selinux-testsuite/runtest.sh
@@ -184,6 +184,9 @@ rlJournalStart
which
"
rlRun "installDeps \$REQUIRES" 0 "Install requires"
+ if rlIsRHEL '>=8'; then
+ rlRun "dnf install --enablerepo rhel-CRB -y libbpf-devel"
+ fi
rlPhaseEnd
rlPhaseStartSetup
@@ -346,9 +349,13 @@ rlJournalStart
rlRun "cat >>policy/test_mmap.te <<<'allow_map(test_no_execmem_t, tmpfs_t, file)'"
fi
- if rlIsRHEL || [ "$(rlGetPrimaryArch)" != x86_64 ]; then
- rlRun "sed -i '/SUBDIRS += bpf/d;/export CFLAGS += -DHAVE_BPF/d' tests/Makefile" 0 \
- "Disable BPF tests on RHEL and non-x86_64 Fedora"
+ if [ -f /proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled ] &&
+ [ "$(cat /proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled)" -eq 1 ] ||
+ [ "$(rlGetPrimaryArch)" != x86_64 ]
+ then
+ rlLog "Unprivileged BPF disabled => add CAP_SYS_ADMIN to BPF domains"
+ rlRun "echo 'allow bpfdomain self:capability { sys_admin };' >>policy/test_bpf.te"
+ rlRun "echo 'allow fdreceivebpfdomain self:capability { sys_admin };' >>policy/test_fdreceive_bpf.te"
fi
# CKI mainline kernels don't ship with module build infrastructure
reply other threads:[~2026-09-11 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178913266891.1.15757820566324728344.tests-selinux-a3e35f88ec4e@fedoraproject.org \
--to=omosnace@redhat.com \
--cc=git-commits@fedoraproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox