public inbox for git-commits@fedoraproject.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: git-commits@fedoraproject.org
Subject: [rpms/gcc] rhel-f41-base: 9.0.1-0.13
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 12:28:25 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <178273610519.1.16895940952669970858.rpms-gcc-84af04ddb6af@fedoraproject.org> (raw)

A new commit has been pushed.

Repo   : rpms/gcc
Branch : rhel-f41-base
Commit : 84af04ddb6af26cabda603e2dda3d64c0c0d7559
Author : Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date   : 2019-04-15T20:12:21+02:00
Stats  : +304/-1 in 5 file(s)
URL    : https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gcc/c/84af04ddb6af26cabda603e2dda3d64c0c0d7559?branch=rhel-f41-base

Log:
9.0.1-0.13

---
diff --git a/gcc.spec b/gcc.spec
index 8b02282..093e6ef 100644
--- a/gcc.spec
+++ b/gcc.spec
@@ -255,6 +255,9 @@ Patch9: gcc9-Wno-format-security.patch
 Patch10: gcc9-rh1574936.patch
 Patch11: gcc9-d-shared-libphobos.patch
 Patch12: gcc9-pr89093.patch
+Patch13: gcc9-pr89794.patch
+Patch14: gcc9-pr90071.patch
+Patch15: gcc9-pr90074.patch
 
 Patch1000: nvptx-tools-no-ptxas.patch
 Patch1001: nvptx-tools-build.patch
@@ -766,6 +769,9 @@ to NVidia PTX capable devices if available.
 %endif
 %patch11 -p0 -b .d-shared-libphobos~
 %patch12 -p0 -b .pr89093~
+%patch13 -p0 -b .pr89794~
+%patch14 -p0 -b .pr90071~
+%patch15 -p0 -b .pr90074~
 
 cd nvptx-tools-%{nvptx_tools_gitrev}
 %patch1000 -p1 -b .nvptx-tools-no-ptxas~
@@ -2992,6 +2998,7 @@ end
 	tree-optimization/89730, tree-optimization/89956,
 	tree-optimization/89998, tree-optimization/90006,
 	tree-optimization/90018, tree-optimization/90020
+- PRs rtl-optimization/89794, tree-optimization/90071, debug/90074
 
 * Thu Mar 28 2019 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> 9.0.1-0.12
 - update from trunk

diff --git a/gcc9-foffload-default.patch b/gcc9-foffload-default.patch
index 2ecd537..ac462f1 100644
--- a/gcc9-foffload-default.patch
+++ b/gcc9-foffload-default.patch
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ libgomp/
 +
    if (!compiler)
      fatal_error (input_location,
- 		 "could not find %s in %s (consider using '-B')\n", suffix + 1,
+ 		 "could not find %s in %s (consider using %<-B%>)\n",
 @@ -883,6 +890,7 @@ compile_images_for_offload_targets (unsi
    unsigned num_targets = parse_env_var (target_names, &names, NULL);
  

diff --git a/gcc9-pr89794.patch b/gcc9-pr89794.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d76f002
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc9-pr89794.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+2019-04-15  Segher Boessenkool  <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
+
+	PR rtl-optimization/89794
+	* combine.c (count_auto_inc): New function.
+	(try_combine): Count how many auto_inc expressions there were in the
+	original instructions.  Ensure we have the same number in the new
+	instructions.  Remove the code that tried to ensure auto_inc side
+	effects on i1 and i0 are not lost.
+
+	* gcc.dg/torture/pr89794.c: New testcase.
+
+--- gcc/combine.c	(revision 270367)
++++ gcc/combine.c	(revision 270368)
+@@ -2641,6 +2641,16 @@ is_just_move (rtx x)
+   return (GET_CODE (x) == SET && general_operand (SET_SRC (x), VOIDmode));
+ }
+ 
++/* Callback function to count autoincs.  */
++
++static int
++count_auto_inc (rtx, rtx, rtx, rtx, rtx, void *arg)
++{
++  (*((int *) arg))++;
++
++  return 0;
++}
++
+ /* Try to combine the insns I0, I1 and I2 into I3.
+    Here I0, I1 and I2 appear earlier than I3.
+    I0 and I1 can be zero; then we combine just I2 into I3, or I1 and I2 into
+@@ -2706,6 +2716,7 @@ try_combine (rtx_insn *i3, rtx_insn *i2,
+   int split_i2i3 = 0;
+   int changed_i3_dest = 0;
+   bool i2_was_move = false, i3_was_move = false;
++  int n_auto_inc = 0;
+ 
+   int maxreg;
+   rtx_insn *temp_insn;
+@@ -3210,6 +3221,16 @@ try_combine (rtx_insn *i3, rtx_insn *i2,
+       return 0;
+     }
+ 
++  /* Count how many auto_inc expressions there were in the original insns;
++     we need to have the same number in the resulting patterns.  */
++
++  if (i0)
++    for_each_inc_dec (PATTERN (i0), count_auto_inc, &n_auto_inc);
++  if (i1)
++    for_each_inc_dec (PATTERN (i1), count_auto_inc, &n_auto_inc);
++  for_each_inc_dec (PATTERN (i2), count_auto_inc, &n_auto_inc);
++  for_each_inc_dec (PATTERN (i3), count_auto_inc, &n_auto_inc);
++
+   /* If the set in I2 needs to be kept around, we must make a copy of
+      PATTERN (I2), so that when we substitute I1SRC for I1DEST in
+      PATTERN (I2), we are only substituting for the original I1DEST, not into
+@@ -3411,18 +3432,11 @@ try_combine (rtx_insn *i3, rtx_insn *i2,
+ 
+   if (i1 && GET_CODE (newpat) != CLOBBER)
+     {
+-      /* Check that an autoincrement side-effect on I1 has not been lost.
+-	 This happens if I1DEST is mentioned in I2 and dies there, and
+-	 has disappeared from the new pattern.  */
+-      if ((FIND_REG_INC_NOTE (i1, NULL_RTX) != 0
+-	   && i1_feeds_i2_n
+-	   && dead_or_set_p (i2, i1dest)
+-	   && !reg_overlap_mentioned_p (i1dest, newpat))
+-	   /* Before we can do this substitution, we must redo the test done
+-	      above (see detailed comments there) that ensures I1DEST isn't
+-	      mentioned in any SETs in NEWPAT that are field assignments.  */
+-	  || !combinable_i3pat (NULL, &newpat, i1dest, NULL_RTX, NULL_RTX,
+-				0, 0, 0))
++      /* Before we can do this substitution, we must redo the test done
++	 above (see detailed comments there) that ensures I1DEST isn't
++	 mentioned in any SETs in NEWPAT that are field assignments.  */
++      if (!combinable_i3pat (NULL, &newpat, i1dest, NULL_RTX, NULL_RTX,
++			     0, 0, 0))
+ 	{
+ 	  undo_all ();
+ 	  return 0;
+@@ -3452,12 +3466,8 @@ try_combine (rtx_insn *i3, rtx_insn *i2,
+ 
+   if (i0 && GET_CODE (newpat) != CLOBBER)
+     {
+-      if ((FIND_REG_INC_NOTE (i0, NULL_RTX) != 0
+-	   && ((i0_feeds_i2_n && dead_or_set_p (i2, i0dest))
+-	       || (i0_feeds_i1_n && dead_or_set_p (i1, i0dest)))
+-	   && !reg_overlap_mentioned_p (i0dest, newpat))
+-	  || !combinable_i3pat (NULL, &newpat, i0dest, NULL_RTX, NULL_RTX,
+-				0, 0, 0))
++      if (!combinable_i3pat (NULL, &newpat, i0dest, NULL_RTX, NULL_RTX,
++			     0, 0, 0))
+ 	{
+ 	  undo_all ();
+ 	  return 0;
+@@ -3478,6 +3488,20 @@ try_combine (rtx_insn *i3, rtx_insn *i2,
+       substed_i0 = 1;
+     }
+ 
++  if (n_auto_inc)
++    {
++      int new_n_auto_inc = 0;
++      for_each_inc_dec (newpat, count_auto_inc, &new_n_auto_inc);
++
++      if (n_auto_inc != new_n_auto_inc)
++	{
++	  if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
++	    fprintf (dump_file, "Number of auto_inc expressions changed\n");
++	  undo_all ();
++	  return 0;
++	}
++    }
++
+   /* Fail if an autoincrement side-effect has been duplicated.  Be careful
+      to count all the ways that I2SRC and I1SRC can be used.  */
+   if ((FIND_REG_INC_NOTE (i2, NULL_RTX) != 0
+--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr89794.c	(nonexistent)
++++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr89794.c	(revision 270368)
+@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
++/* { dg-do run } */
++
++typedef unsigned short u16;
++typedef unsigned int u32;
++typedef unsigned long long u64;
++
++u32 a, b, c, d;
++
++u32 foo (u32 f, u32 g, u32 g2, u32 g3, u16 h, u16 i)
++{
++  (void)g, (void)g2, (void)g3, (void)h;
++  d = __builtin_bswap64 (i);
++  __builtin_sub_overflow (0, d, &b);
++  __builtin_memset (&i, c, 2);
++  a = 0;
++  return b + f + i + c;
++}
++
++int main (void)
++{
++  u32 x = foo (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
++  asm ("" :: "r" (x));
++  return 0;
++}

diff --git a/gcc9-pr90071.patch b/gcc9-pr90071.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..66dcb3a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc9-pr90071.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+2019-04-15  Richard Biener  <rguenther@suse.de>
+
+	PR tree-optimization/90071
+	* tree-ssa-reassoc.c (init_range_entry): Do not pick up
+	abnormal operands from def stmts.
+
+	* gcc.dg/torture/pr90071.c: New testcase.
+
+--- gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c	(revision 270368)
++++ gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c	(revision 270369)
+@@ -2143,7 +2143,8 @@ init_range_entry (struct range_entry *r,
+ 	  exp_type = boolean_type_node;
+ 	}
+ 
+-      if (TREE_CODE (arg0) != SSA_NAME)
++      if (TREE_CODE (arg0) != SSA_NAME
++	  || SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI (arg0))
+ 	break;
+       loc = gimple_location (stmt);
+       switch (code)
+--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr90071.c	(nonexistent)
++++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr90071.c	(revision 270369)
+@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
++/* { dg-do compile } */
++
++int a;
++static int b;
++
++void
++foo ()
++{
++  int d;
++  int e = (int) (__INTPTR_TYPE__) &&f;
++  void *g = &&h;
++h: ++e;
++   if (a)
++     i: goto *g;
++   for (;;)
++     {
++       e = 0;
++       if (b)
++	 goto i;
++     }
++f:
++   goto *({ d || e < 0 || e >= 2; });
++   &e;
++}

diff --git a/gcc9-pr90074.patch b/gcc9-pr90074.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b57aac2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc9-pr90074.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+2019-04-15  Richard Biener  <rguenther@suse.de>
+
+	PR debug/90074
+	* tree-loop-distribution.c (destroy_loop): Preserve correct
+	debug info.
+
+	* gcc.dg/guality/pr90074.c: New testcase.
+
+--- gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c	(revision 270369)
++++ gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c	(revision 270370)
+@@ -1094,12 +1094,8 @@ destroy_loop (struct loop *loop)
+ 
+   bbs = get_loop_body_in_dom_order (loop);
+ 
+-  redirect_edge_pred (exit, src);
+-  exit->flags &= ~(EDGE_TRUE_VALUE|EDGE_FALSE_VALUE);
+-  exit->flags |= EDGE_FALLTHRU;
+-  cancel_loop_tree (loop);
+-  rescan_loop_exit (exit, false, true);
+-
++  gimple_stmt_iterator dst_gsi = gsi_after_labels (exit->dest);
++  bool safe_p = single_pred_p (exit->dest);
+   i = nbbs;
+   do
+     {
+@@ -1116,14 +1112,45 @@ destroy_loop (struct loop *loop)
+ 	  if (virtual_operand_p (gimple_phi_result (phi)))
+ 	    mark_virtual_phi_result_for_renaming (phi);
+ 	}
+-      for (gimple_stmt_iterator gsi = gsi_start_bb (bbs[i]); !gsi_end_p (gsi);
+-	   gsi_next (&gsi))
++      for (gimple_stmt_iterator gsi = gsi_start_bb (bbs[i]); !gsi_end_p (gsi);)
+ 	{
+ 	  gimple *stmt = gsi_stmt (gsi);
+ 	  tree vdef = gimple_vdef (stmt);
+ 	  if (vdef && TREE_CODE (vdef) == SSA_NAME)
+ 	    mark_virtual_operand_for_renaming (vdef);
++	  /* Also move and eventually reset debug stmts.  We can leave
++	     constant values in place in case the stmt dominates the exit.
++	     ???  Non-constant values from the last iteration can be
++	     replaced with final values if we can compute them.  */
++	  if (gimple_debug_bind_p (stmt))
++	    {
++	      tree val = gimple_debug_bind_get_value (stmt);
++	      gsi_move_before (&gsi, &dst_gsi);
++	      if (val
++		  && (!safe_p
++		      || !is_gimple_min_invariant (val)
++		      || !dominated_by_p (CDI_DOMINATORS, exit->src, bbs[i])))
++		{
++		  gimple_debug_bind_reset_value (stmt);
++		  update_stmt (stmt);
++		}
++	    }
++	  else
++	    gsi_next (&gsi);
+ 	}
++    }
++  while (i != 0);
++
++  redirect_edge_pred (exit, src);
++  exit->flags &= ~(EDGE_TRUE_VALUE|EDGE_FALSE_VALUE);
++  exit->flags |= EDGE_FALLTHRU;
++  cancel_loop_tree (loop);
++  rescan_loop_exit (exit, false, true);
++
++  i = nbbs;
++  do
++    {
++      --i;
+       delete_basic_block (bbs[i]);
+     }
+   while (i != 0);
+--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/pr90074.c	(nonexistent)
++++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/pr90074.c	(revision 270370)
+@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
++/* { dg-do run } */
++/* { dg-options "-g" } */
++
++void __attribute__((noinline))
++optimize_me_not ()
++{
++  __asm__ volatile ("" : : : "memory");
++}
++char a;
++short b[7][1];
++int main()
++{
++  int i, c;
++  a = 0;
++  i = 0;
++  for (; i < 7; i++) {
++      c = 0;
++      for (; c < 1; c++)
++	b[i][c] = 0;
++  }
++  /* i may very well be optimized out, so we cannot test for i == 7.
++     Instead test i + 1 which will make the test UNSUPPORTED if i
++     is optimized out.  Since the test previously had wrong debug
++     with i == 0 this is acceptable.  Optimally we'd produce a
++     debug stmt for the final value of the loop during loop distribution
++     which would fix the UNSUPPORTED cases.
++     c is optimized out at -Og for no obvious reason.  */
++  optimize_me_not(); /* { dg-final { gdb-test . "i + 1" "8" } } */
++    /* { dg-final { gdb-test .-1 "c + 1" "2" } } */
++  return 0;
++}

             reply	other threads:[~2026-06-29 12:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-29 12:28 Jakub Jelinek [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-06-29 12:28 [rpms/gcc] rhel-f41-base: 9.0.1-0.13 Jakub Jelinek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=178273610519.1.16895940952669970858.rpms-gcc-84af04ddb6af@fedoraproject.org \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=git-commits@fedoraproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox