public inbox for git-commits@fedoraproject.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: git-commits@fedoraproject.org
Subject: [rpms/gcc] rhel-f41-base: 5.0.0-0.20
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 12:26:45 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <178273600516.1.7258893997880650288.rpms-gcc-91c7bec96962@fedoraproject.org> (raw)

A new commit has been pushed.

Repo   : rpms/gcc
Branch : rhel-f41-base
Commit : 91c7bec96962f30aeb6dc54230bd42b8713f1ee2
Author : Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date   : 2015-03-16T18:42:57+01:00
Stats  : +11/-332 in 6 file(s)
URL    : https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gcc/c/91c7bec96962f30aeb6dc54230bd42b8713f1ee2?branch=rhel-f41-base

Log:
5.0.0-0.20

---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index bcc3c94..cf75c64 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -11,3 +11,4 @@
 /gcc-5.0.0-20150224.tar.bz2
 /gcc-5.0.0-20150226.tar.bz2
 /gcc-5.0.0-20150313.tar.bz2
+/gcc-5.0.0-20150316.tar.bz2

diff --git a/gcc.spec b/gcc.spec
index 00266a8..19ebe26 100644
--- a/gcc.spec
+++ b/gcc.spec
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
-%global DATE 20150313
-%global SVNREV 221424
+%global DATE 20150316
+%global SVNREV 221461
 %global gcc_version 5.0.0
 # Note, gcc_release must be integer, if you want to add suffixes to
 # %{release}, append them after %{gcc_release} on Release: line.
-%global gcc_release 0.19
+%global gcc_release 0.20
 %global _unpackaged_files_terminate_build 0
 %global _performance_build 1
 %global multilib_64_archs sparc64 ppc64 ppc64p7 s390x x86_64
@@ -198,9 +198,6 @@ Patch11: gcc5-no-add-needed.patch
 Patch12: gcc5-libgo-p224.patch
 Patch13: gcc5-aarch64-async-unw-tables.patch
 Patch14: gcc5-libsanitize-aarch64-va42.patch
-Patch15: gcc5-pr65369.patch
-Patch16: gcc5-pr65401.patch
-Patch17: gcc5-pr65418.patch
 
 # On ARM EABI systems, we do want -gnueabi to be part of the
 # target triple.
@@ -750,9 +747,6 @@ package or when debugging this package.
 rm -f libgo/go/crypto/elliptic/p224{,_test}.go
 %patch13 -p0 -b .aarch64-async-unw-tables~
 %patch14 -p0 -b .libsanitize-aarch64-va42~
-%patch15 -p0 -b .pr65369~
-%patch16 -p0 -b .pr65401~
-%patch17 -p0 -b .pr65418~
 
 %if 0%{?_enable_debug_packages}
 mkdir dwz-wrapper
@@ -1026,7 +1020,7 @@ CC="$CC" CXX="$CXX" CFLAGS="$OPT_FLAGS" \
 	--enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,fortran${enablelada}${enablelgo},lto \
 	$CONFIGURE_OPTS
 
-%ifarch sparc sparcv9 sparc64 aarch64
+%ifarch sparc sparcv9 sparc64 %{arm}
 make %{?_smp_mflags} BOOT_CFLAGS="$OPT_FLAGS" bootstrap
 %else
 make %{?_smp_mflags} BOOT_CFLAGS="$OPT_FLAGS" profiledbootstrap
@@ -2938,6 +2932,11 @@ fi
 %doc rpm.doc/changelogs/libcc1/ChangeLog*
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Mar 16 2015 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> 5.0.0-0.20
+- update from the trunk
+  - PRs fortran/61138, middle-end/65409, middle-end/65414, middle-end/65431,
+	sanitizer/64820, target/63150
+
 * Fri Mar 13 2015 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> 5.0.0-0.19
 - update from the trunk
   - PRs ada/65259, ada/65319, bootstrap/25672, bootstrap/65150, c++/64227,

diff --git a/gcc5-pr65369.patch b/gcc5-pr65369.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index d355d88..0000000
--- a/gcc5-pr65369.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,81 +0,0 @@
-2015-03-13  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
-
-	PR tree-optimization/65369
-	* tree-vect-stmts.c (vectorizable_load) <case dr_explicit_realign>:
-	Set bump to vs * TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (elem_type) - 1 instead of
-	(vs - 1) * TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (elem_type).
-
-	* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr65369.c: New test.
-
---- gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c.jj	2015-03-09 08:05:13.000000000 +0100
-+++ gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c	2015-03-13 17:27:30.613529768 +0100
-@@ -6468,9 +6468,8 @@ vectorizable_load (gimple stmt, gimple_s
- 		case dr_explicit_realign:
- 		  {
- 		    tree ptr, bump;
--		    tree vs_minus_1;
- 
--		    vs_minus_1 = size_int (TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (vectype) - 1);
-+		    tree vs = size_int (TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (vectype));
- 
- 		    if (compute_in_loop)
- 		      msq = vect_setup_realignment (first_stmt, gsi,
-@@ -6499,8 +6498,9 @@ vectorizable_load (gimple stmt, gimple_s
- 		    vect_finish_stmt_generation (stmt, new_stmt, gsi);
- 		    msq = new_temp;
- 
--		    bump = size_binop (MULT_EXPR, vs_minus_1,
-+		    bump = size_binop (MULT_EXPR, vs,
- 				       TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (elem_type));
-+		    bump = size_binop (MINUS_EXPR, bump, size_one_node);
- 		    ptr = bump_vector_ptr (dataref_ptr, NULL, gsi, stmt, bump);
- 		    new_stmt = gimple_build_assign
- 				 (NULL_TREE, BIT_AND_EXPR, ptr,
---- gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr65369.c.jj	2015-03-13 17:37:10.926175685 +0100
-+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr65369.c	2015-03-13 17:35:40.000000000 +0100
-@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
-+/* PR tree-optimization/65369 */
-+
-+static const char data[] =
-+  "12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890"
-+  "123456789012345678901234567890";
-+
-+__attribute__ ((noinline))
-+static void foo (const unsigned int *buf)
-+{
-+  if (__builtin_memcmp (buf, data, 64))
-+    __builtin_abort ();
-+}
-+
-+__attribute__ ((noinline))
-+static void bar (const unsigned char *block)
-+{
-+  unsigned int buf[16];
-+  __builtin_memcpy (buf +  0, block +  0, 4);
-+  __builtin_memcpy (buf +  1, block +  4, 4);
-+  __builtin_memcpy (buf +  2, block +  8, 4);
-+  __builtin_memcpy (buf +  3, block + 12, 4);
-+  __builtin_memcpy (buf +  4, block + 16, 4);
-+  __builtin_memcpy (buf +  5, block + 20, 4);
-+  __builtin_memcpy (buf +  6, block + 24, 4);
-+  __builtin_memcpy (buf +  7, block + 28, 4);
-+  __builtin_memcpy (buf +  8, block + 32, 4);
-+  __builtin_memcpy (buf +  9, block + 36, 4);
-+  __builtin_memcpy (buf + 10, block + 40, 4);
-+  __builtin_memcpy (buf + 11, block + 44, 4);
-+  __builtin_memcpy (buf + 12, block + 48, 4);
-+  __builtin_memcpy (buf + 13, block + 52, 4);
-+  __builtin_memcpy (buf + 14, block + 56, 4);
-+  __builtin_memcpy (buf + 15, block + 60, 4);
-+  foo (buf);
-+}
-+
-+int
-+main ()
-+{
-+  unsigned char input[sizeof data + 16] __attribute__((aligned (16)));
-+  __builtin_memset (input, 0, sizeof input);
-+  __builtin_memcpy (input + 1, data, sizeof data);
-+  bar (input + 1);
-+  return 0;
-+}

diff --git a/gcc5-pr65401.patch b/gcc5-pr65401.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index c4f31bc..0000000
--- a/gcc5-pr65401.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,151 +0,0 @@
-2015-03-13  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
-
-	PR rtl-optimization/65401
-	* combine.c (rtx_equal_for_field_assignment_p): Add widen_x
-	argument.  If true, adjust_address_nv of x with big-endian
-	correction for the mode widening to GET_MODE (y).
-	(make_field_assignment): Don't do MEM mode widening here.
-	Use MEM_P instead of GET_CODE == MEM.
-
-	* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr65401.c: New test.
-
---- gcc/combine.c.jj	2015-02-03 10:38:46.000000000 +0100
-+++ gcc/combine.c	2015-03-13 18:46:45.710940306 +0100
-@@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ static rtx force_to_mode (rtx, machine_m
- 			  unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT, int);
- static rtx if_then_else_cond (rtx, rtx *, rtx *);
- static rtx known_cond (rtx, enum rtx_code, rtx, rtx);
--static int rtx_equal_for_field_assignment_p (rtx, rtx);
-+static int rtx_equal_for_field_assignment_p (rtx, rtx, bool = false);
- static rtx make_field_assignment (rtx);
- static rtx apply_distributive_law (rtx);
- static rtx distribute_and_simplify_rtx (rtx, int);
-@@ -9184,8 +9184,23 @@ known_cond (rtx x, enum rtx_code cond, r
-    assignment as a field assignment.  */
- 
- static int
--rtx_equal_for_field_assignment_p (rtx x, rtx y)
-+rtx_equal_for_field_assignment_p (rtx x, rtx y, bool widen_x)
- {
-+  if (widen_x && GET_MODE (x) != GET_MODE (y))
-+    {
-+      if (GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (x)) > GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (y)))
-+	return 0;
-+      if (BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN != WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN)
-+	return 0;
-+      /* For big endian, adjust the memory offset.  */
-+      if (BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN)
-+	x = adjust_address_nv (x, GET_MODE (y),
-+			       -subreg_lowpart_offset (GET_MODE (x),
-+						       GET_MODE (y)));
-+      else
-+	x = adjust_address_nv (x, GET_MODE (y), 0);
-+    }
-+
-   if (x == y || rtx_equal_p (x, y))
-     return 1;
- 
-@@ -9339,16 +9354,15 @@ make_field_assignment (rtx x)
-   /* The second SUBREG that might get in the way is a paradoxical
-      SUBREG around the first operand of the AND.  We want to 
-      pretend the operand is as wide as the destination here.   We
--     do this by creating a new MEM in the wider mode for the sole
-+     do this by adjusting the MEM to wider mode for the sole
-      purpose of the call to rtx_equal_for_field_assignment_p.   Also
-      note this trick only works for MEMs.  */
-   else if (GET_CODE (rhs) == AND
- 	   && paradoxical_subreg_p (XEXP (rhs, 0))
--	   && GET_CODE (SUBREG_REG (XEXP (rhs, 0))) == MEM
-+	   && MEM_P (SUBREG_REG (XEXP (rhs, 0)))
- 	   && CONST_INT_P (XEXP (rhs, 1))
--	   && rtx_equal_for_field_assignment_p (gen_rtx_MEM (GET_MODE (dest),
--							     XEXP (SUBREG_REG (XEXP (rhs, 0)), 0)),
--						dest))
-+	   && rtx_equal_for_field_assignment_p (SUBREG_REG (XEXP (rhs, 0)),
-+						dest, true))
-     c1 = INTVAL (XEXP (rhs, 1)), other = lhs;
-   else if (GET_CODE (lhs) == AND
- 	   && CONST_INT_P (XEXP (lhs, 1))
-@@ -9357,16 +9371,15 @@ make_field_assignment (rtx x)
-   /* The second SUBREG that might get in the way is a paradoxical
-      SUBREG around the first operand of the AND.  We want to 
-      pretend the operand is as wide as the destination here.   We
--     do this by creating a new MEM in the wider mode for the sole
-+     do this by adjusting the MEM to wider mode for the sole
-      purpose of the call to rtx_equal_for_field_assignment_p.   Also
-      note this trick only works for MEMs.  */
-   else if (GET_CODE (lhs) == AND
- 	   && paradoxical_subreg_p (XEXP (lhs, 0))
--	   && GET_CODE (SUBREG_REG (XEXP (lhs, 0))) == MEM
-+	   && MEM_P (SUBREG_REG (XEXP (lhs, 0)))
- 	   && CONST_INT_P (XEXP (lhs, 1))
--	   && rtx_equal_for_field_assignment_p (gen_rtx_MEM (GET_MODE (dest),
--							     XEXP (SUBREG_REG (XEXP (lhs, 0)), 0)),
--						dest))
-+	   && rtx_equal_for_field_assignment_p (SUBREG_REG (XEXP (lhs, 0)),
-+						dest, true))
-     c1 = INTVAL (XEXP (lhs, 1)), other = rhs;
-   else
-     return x;
---- gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr65401.c.jj	2015-03-13 18:36:30.639817393 +0100
-+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr65401.c	2015-03-13 18:42:02.693485127 +0100
-@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
-+/* PR rtl-optimization/65401 */
-+
-+struct S { unsigned short s[64]; };
-+
-+__attribute__((noinline, noclone)) void
-+foo (struct S *x)
-+{
-+  unsigned int i;
-+  unsigned char *s;
-+
-+  s = (unsigned char *) x->s;
-+  for (i = 0; i < 64; i++)
-+    x->s[i] = s[i * 2] | (s[i * 2 + 1] << 8);
-+}  
-+
-+__attribute__((noinline, noclone)) void
-+bar (struct S *x)
-+{
-+  unsigned int i;
-+  unsigned char *s;
-+
-+  s = (unsigned char *) x->s;
-+  for (i = 0; i < 64; i++)
-+    x->s[i] = (s[i * 2] << 8) | s[i * 2 + 1];
-+}  
-+
-+int
-+main ()
-+{
-+  unsigned int i;
-+  struct S s;
-+  if (sizeof (unsigned short) != 2)
-+    return 0;
-+  for (i = 0; i < 64; i++)
-+    s.s[i] = i + ((64 - i) << 8);
-+  foo (&s);
-+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__
-+  for (i = 0; i < 64; i++)
-+    if (s.s[i] != (64 - i) + (i << 8))
-+      __builtin_abort ();
-+#elif __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
-+  for (i = 0; i < 64; i++)
-+    if (s.s[i] != i + ((64 - i) << 8))
-+      __builtin_abort ();
-+#endif
-+  for (i = 0; i < 64; i++)
-+    s.s[i] = i + ((64 - i) << 8);
-+  bar (&s);
-+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
-+  for (i = 0; i < 64; i++)
-+    if (s.s[i] != (64 - i) + (i << 8))
-+      __builtin_abort ();
-+#elif __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__
-+  for (i = 0; i < 64; i++)
-+    if (s.s[i] != i + ((64 - i) << 8))
-+      __builtin_abort ();
-+#endif
-+  return 0;
-+}

diff --git a/gcc5-pr65418.patch b/gcc5-pr65418.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 10b9351..0000000
--- a/gcc5-pr65418.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,89 +0,0 @@
-2015-03-13  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
-
-	PR tree-optimization/65418
-	* tree-ssa-reassoc.c (extract_bit_test_mask): If there
-	are casts in the first PLUS_EXPR operand, ensure tbias and
-	*totallowp are in the inner type.
-
-	* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr65418-1.c: New test.
-	* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr65418-2.c: New test.
-
---- gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c.jj	2015-02-26 22:02:39.000000000 +0100
-+++ gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c	2015-03-13 16:22:50.506295252 +0100
-@@ -2439,26 +2439,25 @@ extract_bit_test_mask (tree exp, int pre
- 	      && TREE_CODE (exp) == PLUS_EXPR
- 	      && TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (exp, 1)) == INTEGER_CST)
- 	    {
-+	      tree ret = TREE_OPERAND (exp, 0);
-+	      STRIP_NOPS (ret);
- 	      widest_int bias
- 	        = wi::neg (wi::sext (wi::to_widest (TREE_OPERAND (exp, 1)),
- 				     TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (low))));
--	      tree tbias = wide_int_to_tree (TREE_TYPE (low), bias);
-+	      tree tbias = wide_int_to_tree (TREE_TYPE (ret), bias);
- 	      if (totallowp)
- 		{
- 		  *totallowp = tbias;
--		  exp = TREE_OPERAND (exp, 0);
--		  STRIP_NOPS (exp);
--		  return exp;
-+		  return ret;
- 		}
- 	      else if (!tree_int_cst_lt (totallow, tbias))
- 		return NULL_TREE;
-+	      bias = wi::to_widest (tbias);
- 	      bias -= wi::to_widest (totallow);
- 	      if (wi::ges_p (bias, 0) && wi::lts_p (bias, prec - max))
- 		{
- 		  *mask = wi::lshift (*mask, bias);
--		  exp = TREE_OPERAND (exp, 0);
--		  STRIP_NOPS (exp);
--		  return exp;
-+		  return ret;
- 		}
- 	    }
- 	}
---- gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr65418-1.c.jj	2015-03-13 16:49:07.973604649 +0100
-+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr65418-1.c	2015-03-13 16:48:28.000000000 +0100
-@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
-+/* PR tree-optimization/65418 */
-+
-+__attribute__((noinline, noclone)) int
-+foo (int x)
-+{
-+  if (x == -216 || x == -132 || x == -218 || x == -146)
-+     return 1;
-+  return 0;
-+}
-+
-+int
-+main ()
-+{
-+  volatile int i;
-+  for (i = -230; i < -120; i++)
-+    if (foo (i) != (i == -216 || i == -132 || i == -218 || i == -146))
-+      __builtin_abort ();
-+  return 0;
-+}
---- gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr65418-2.c.jj	2015-03-13 16:49:10.992556110 +0100
-+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr65418-2.c	2015-03-13 16:48:44.000000000 +0100
-@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
-+/* PR tree-optimization/65418 */
-+
-+__attribute__((noinline, noclone)) int
-+foo (int x)
-+{
-+  if (x == -216 || x == -211 || x == -218 || x == -205 || x == -223)
-+     return 1;
-+  return 0;
-+}
-+
-+int
-+main ()
-+{
-+  volatile int i;
-+  for (i = -230; i < -200; i++)
-+    if (foo (i) != (i == -216 || i == -211 || i == -218 || i == -205 || i == -223))
-+      __builtin_abort ();
-+  return 0;
-+}

diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 5df6f80..a33938a 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-51d8b914dba658c69d23c5f7853f843c  gcc-5.0.0-20150313.tar.bz2
+2be0ac7eb39c7042b4cb255153a32988  gcc-5.0.0-20150316.tar.bz2

                 reply	other threads:[~2026-06-29 12:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=178273600516.1.7258893997880650288.rpms-gcc-91c7bec96962@fedoraproject.org \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=git-commits@fedoraproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox