[rpms/gcc] rhel-f41-base: 4.9.1-10

[Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>]

A new commit has been pushed.

Repo   : rpms/gcc
Branch : rhel-f41-base
Commit : 8036281669f2329ddbad08e0ded14f2ab7f93c47
Author : Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date   : 2014-09-22T13:02:00+02:00
Stats  : +63/-50 in 5 file(s)
URL    : https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gcc/c/8036281669f2329ddbad08e0ded14f2ab7f93c47?branch=rhel-f41-base

Log:
4.9.1-10

---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 9b11d33..6dbc88f 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -22,3 +22,4 @@
 /gcc-4.9.1-20140813.tar.bz2
 /gcc-4.9.1-20140815.tar.bz2
 /gcc-4.9.1-20140912.tar.bz2
+/gcc-4.9.1-20140922.tar.bz2

diff --git a/gcc.spec b/gcc.spec
index 5d6041d..ebe81f1 100644
--- a/gcc.spec
+++ b/gcc.spec
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
-%global DATE 20140912
-%global SVNREV 215204
+%global DATE 20140922
+%global SVNREV 215456
 %global gcc_version 4.9.1
 # Note, gcc_release must be integer, if you want to add suffixes to
 # %{release}, append them after %{gcc_release} on Release: line.
-%global gcc_release 9
+%global gcc_release 10
 %global _unpackaged_files_terminate_build 0
 %global _performance_build 1
 %global multilib_64_archs sparc64 ppc64 ppc64p7 s390x x86_64
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ Patch15: gcc49-color-auto.patch
 Patch16: gcc49-libgo-p224.patch
 Patch17: gcc49-aarch64-async-unw-tables.patch
 Patch18: gcc49-aarch64-unwind-opt.patch
-Patch19: gcc49-pr62662.patch
+Patch19: gcc49-pr63285.patch
 
 Patch1100: cloog-%{cloog_version}-ppc64le-config.patch
 
@@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ package or when debugging this package.
 rm -f libgo/go/crypto/elliptic/p224{,_test}.go
 %patch17 -p0 -b .aarch64-async-unw-tables~
 %patch18 -p0 -b .aarch64-unwind-opt~
-%patch19 -p0 -b .pr62662~
+%patch19 -p0 -b .pr63285~
 
 %if 0%{?_enable_debug_packages}
 cat > split-debuginfo.sh <<\EOF
@@ -2802,6 +2802,12 @@ fi
 %{_prefix}/libexec/gcc/%{gcc_target_platform}/%{gcc_version}/plugin
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Sep 22 2014 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> 4.9.1-10
+- update from the 4.9 branch
+  - PRs c++/62017, c++/63241, c++/63248, debug/63284, debug/63328, ipa/61654,
+	target/61853, testsuite/63292
+- fix scheduler -fcompare-debug issue (#1140872, PR debug/63285)
+
 * Fri Sep 12 2014 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> 4.9.1-9
 - update from the 4.9 branch
   - PRs c++/58624, c++/61214, c++/61659, c++/62129, c++/62224, c++/62659,

diff --git a/gcc49-pr62662.patch b/gcc49-pr62662.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 588e1e8..0000000
--- a/gcc49-pr62662.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,44 +0,0 @@
-2014-09-10  Andreas Krebbel  <Andreas.Krebbel@de.ibm.com>
-
-	PR target/62662
-	* config/s390/s390.c (s390_emit_epilogue): When doing the return
-	address load optimization force s390_optimize_prologue to leave it
-	that way.  Only do the optimization if we already decided to push
-	r14 into a stack slot.
-
---- gcc/config/s390/s390.c
-+++ gcc/config/s390/s390.c
-@@ -9082,11 +9082,14 @@ s390_emit_epilogue (bool sibcall)
-       if (! sibcall)
- 	{
- 	  /* Fetch return address from stack before load multiple,
--	     this will do good for scheduling.  */
--
--	  if (cfun_frame_layout.save_return_addr_p
--	      || (cfun_frame_layout.first_restore_gpr < BASE_REGNUM
--		  && cfun_frame_layout.last_restore_gpr > RETURN_REGNUM))
-+	     this will do good for scheduling.
-+
-+	     Only do this if we already decided that r14 needs to be
-+	     saved to a stack slot. (And not just because r14 happens to
-+	     be in between two GPRs which need saving.)  Otherwise it
-+	     would be difficult to take that decision back in
-+	     s390_optimize_prologue.  */
-+	  if (cfun_gpr_save_slot (RETURN_REGNUM) == -1)
- 	    {
- 	      int return_regnum = find_unused_clobbered_reg();
- 	      if (!return_regnum)
-@@ -9101,6 +9104,13 @@ s390_emit_epilogue (bool sibcall)
- 	      addr = gen_rtx_MEM (Pmode, addr);
- 	      set_mem_alias_set (addr, get_frame_alias_set ());
- 	      emit_move_insn (return_reg, addr);
-+
-+	      /* Once we did that optimization we have to make sure
-+		 s390_optimize_prologue does not try to remove the
-+		 store of r14 since we will not be able to find the
-+		 load issued here.  */
-+	      cfun_frame_layout.save_return_addr_p = true;
-+	      cfun_gpr_save_slot (RETURN_REGNUM) = -1;
- 	    }
- 	}
- 

diff --git a/gcc49-pr63285.patch b/gcc49-pr63285.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2216047
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc49-pr63285.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+2014-09-18  Vladimir Makarov  <vmakarov@redhat.com>
+
+	PR debug/63285
+	* haifa-sched.c (schedule_block): Advance cycle at the end of BB
+	if advance != 0.
+
+	* gcc.target/i386/pr63285.c: New test.
+
+--- gcc/haifa-sched.c	(revision 215363)
++++ gcc/haifa-sched.c	(revision 215364)
+@@ -6473,7 +6473,7 @@ schedule_block (basic_block *target_bb,
+   if (ls.modulo_epilogue)
+     success = true;
+  end_schedule:
+-  if (!ls.first_cycle_insn_p)
++  if (!ls.first_cycle_insn_p || advance)
+     advance_one_cycle ();
+   perform_replacements_new_cycle ();
+   if (modulo_ii > 0)
+--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr63285.c	(revision 0)
++++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr63285.c	(revision 215364)
+@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
++/* { dg-do compile } */
++/* { dg-options "-O2 -fcompare-debug" } */
++
++struct S { int a; };
++struct T { int b, c; } a;
++long b;
++int c, d;
++void bar (int, int);
++void baz (void *, int);
++
++void
++foo (struct S *x, int y, int z, void *f, int *p, struct T *e)
++{
++  while (x)
++    {
++      baz (f, &d > p);
++      if (z & 1)
++        bar (f > (void *) &f, z);
++    }
++  if (c)
++    {
++      asm ("" : "+m" (a) : "i" (0));
++      y--;
++    }
++  if (e->b == e->c)
++    c = y;
++  y--;
++}

diff --git a/sources b/sources
index efe539e..ecf1397 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 e34fca0540d840e5d0f6427e98c92252  cloog-0.18.1.tar.gz
-c7ea3e348924af6932bc3cfb32e2ea54  gcc-4.9.1-20140912.tar.bz2
+2293d26b82a5fef7f8beff816ee424c8  gcc-4.9.1-20140922.tar.bz2
 e039bfcfb6c2ab039b8ee69bf883e824  isl-0.12.2.tar.bz2