public inbox for git-commits@fedoraproject.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@fedoraproject.org>
To: git-commits@fedoraproject.org
Subject: [rpms/gcc] rhel-f41-base: 4.1.0-4
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 12:22:20 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178273574095.1.15349540257315649139.rpms-gcc-6a07d2500b69@fedoraproject.org> (raw)
A new commit has been pushed.
Repo : rpms/gcc
Branch : rhel-f41-base
Commit : 6a07d2500b69648ea9b6fb72d96b14a579bdc389
Author : Jakub Jelinek <jakub@fedoraproject.org>
Date : 2006-03-28T13:28:54+00:00
Stats : +100/-9 in 5 file(s)
URL : https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gcc/c/6a07d2500b69648ea9b6fb72d96b14a579bdc389?branch=rhel-f41-base
Log:
4.1.0-4
---
diff --git a/.cvsignore b/.cvsignore
index f07ecfe..454d780 100644
--- a/.cvsignore
+++ b/.cvsignore
@@ -1 +1 @@
-gcc-4.1.0-20060304.tar.bz2
+gcc-4.1.0-20060328.tar.bz2
diff --git a/gcc41-pr20297-test.patch b/gcc41-pr20297-test.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..52d1ab9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc41-pr20297-test.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+2006-03-28 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
+
+ PR middle-end/20297
+ * gcc.dg/visibility-11.c: Moved to...
+ * gcc.target/i386/visibility-1.c: ... here. Only run on
+ 32-bit linux and bsds.
+
+--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/visibility-11.c.jj 2006-03-24 17:07:15.000000000 +0100
++++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/visibility-11.c 2006-03-28 14:59:27.000000000 +0200
+@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
+-/* PR middle-end/20297 */
+-/* The memcpy FUNCTION_DECL built in the middle-end for block moves got
+- hidden visibility from the first push, so the call didn't use the PLT. */
+-
+-/* { dg-do compile { target i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } */
+-/* { dg-require-visibility "" } */
+-/* { dg-options "-Os -fpic" } */
+-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "memcpy@PLT" } } */
+-
+-#pragma GCC visibility push(hidden)
+-#pragma GCC visibility push(default)
+-extern void* memcpy (void *, const void *, __SIZE_TYPE__);
+-#pragma GCC visibility pop
+-
+-struct a { int a[10]; };
+-
+-extern void *bar (struct a *, struct a *, int);
+-
+-void *
+-foo (struct a *a, struct a *b, int c)
+-{
+- struct a cc = *b;
+- return bar (a, &cc, 4 * c);
+-}
+--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/visibility-1.c.jj 2006-03-28 14:30:17.000000000 +0200
++++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/visibility-1.c 2006-03-28 14:58:48.000000000 +0200
+@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
++/* PR middle-end/20297 */
++/* The memcpy FUNCTION_DECL built in the middle-end for block moves got
++ hidden visibility from the first push, so the call didn't use the PLT. */
++
++/* { dg-do compile { target { { i?86-*-linux* x86_64-*-linux* i?86-*-*bsd* x86_64-*-*bsd* } && ilp32 } } } */
++/* { dg-require-visibility "" } */
++/* { dg-options "-Os -fpic" } */
++/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "memcpy@PLT" } } */
++
++#pragma GCC visibility push(hidden)
++#pragma GCC visibility push(default)
++extern void* memcpy (void *, const void *, __SIZE_TYPE__);
++#pragma GCC visibility pop
++
++struct a { int a[10]; };
++
++extern void *bar (struct a *, struct a *, int);
++
++void *
++foo (struct a *a, struct a *b, int c)
++{
++ struct a cc = *b;
++ return bar (a, &cc, 4 * c);
++}
diff --git a/gcc41-rh184446.patch b/gcc41-rh184446.patch
index 5579280..db1e47b 100644
--- a/gcc41-rh184446.patch
+++ b/gcc41-rh184446.patch
@@ -1,12 +1,10 @@
-for gcc/ChangeLog
-from Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
+2006-03-09 Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
+ Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_legitimize_tls_address): Use
secure-plt-compatible load sequence to compute the GOT address
for -fPIC -msecure-plt.
-Index: gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
-===================================================================
--- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c.orig 2006-03-09 20:02:13.000000000 -0300
+++ gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c 2006-03-09 22:00:43.000000000 -0300
@@ -3081,7 +3081,7 @@ rs6000_legitimize_tls_address (rtx addr,
diff --git a/gcc41.spec b/gcc41.spec
index 38c9750..5fac8e1 100644
--- a/gcc41.spec
+++ b/gcc41.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
-%define DATE 20060304
+%define DATE 20060328
%define gcc_version 4.1.0
-%define gcc_release 3
+%define gcc_release 4
%define _unpackaged_files_terminate_build 0
%define multilib_64_archs sparc64 ppc64 s390x x86_64
%ifarch %{ix86} x86_64 ia64
@@ -108,6 +108,9 @@ Patch10: gcc41-x86_64-sse3.patch
Patch11: gcc41-mni.patch
Patch12: gcc41-cfaval.patch
Patch13: gcc41-rh184446.patch
+Patch14: gcc41-pr21764.patch
+Patch15: gcc41-pr21581.patch
+Patch16: gcc41-pr20297-test.patch
%define _gnu %{nil}
%ifarch sparc
@@ -400,6 +403,9 @@ which are required to run programs compiled with the GNAT.
%patch11 -p0 -b .mni~
%patch12 -p0 -b .cfaval~
%patch13 -p0 -b .rh184446~
+%patch14 -p0 -b .pr21764~
+%patch15 -p0 -b .pr21581~
+%patch16 -p0 -E -b .pr20297-test~
sed -i -e 's/4\.1\.1/4.1.0/' gcc/BASE-VER gcc/version.c
sed -i -e 's/" (Red Hat[^)]*)"/" (Red Hat %{version}-%{gcc_release})"/' gcc/version.c
@@ -1417,12 +1423,38 @@ fi
%doc rpm.doc/changelogs/libmudflap/ChangeLog*
%changelog
+* Tue Mar 28 2006 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> 4.1.0-4
+- update from gcc-4_1-branch (-r111697:112431)
+ - PRs ada/25885, c/26004, fortran/17298, fortran/20935, fortran/20938,
+ fortran/23092, fortran/24519, fortran/24557, fortran/25045,
+ fortran/25054, fortran/25075, fortran/25089, fortran/25378,
+ fortran/25395, fortran/26041, fortran/26054, fortran/26064,
+ fortran/26107, fortran/26277, fortran/26393, fortran/26716,
+ fortran/26741, libfortran/21303, libfortran/24903, libgcj/24461,
+ libgcj/25713, libgcj/26103, libgcj/26688, libgcj/26706,
+ libgfortran/26499, libgfortran/26509, libgfortran/26554,
+ libgfortran/26661, libgfortran/26880, libstdc++/26132,
+ middle-end/18859, middle-end/19543, middle-end/26557,
+ middle-end/26630, other/26489, target/25917, target/26347,
+ target/26459, target/26532, target/26607, tree-optimization/26524,
+ tree-optimization/26587, tree-optimization/26672
+ - fix visibility and builtins interaction (Jason Merrill,
+ PR middle-end/20297, #175442)
+- merge gomp changes from trunk (-r112022:112023, -r112250:112251,
+ -r112252:112253, -r112350:112351 and -r112282:112283)
+ - PRs c++/26691, middle-end/26084, middle-end/26611, c++/26690,
+ middle-end/25989
+- support visibility attribute on namespaces (Jason Merrill, PR c++/21764,
+ PR c++/19238)
+- use hidden visibility for anonymous namespaces by default (Jason Merrill,
+ PR c++/21581)
+
* Thu Mar 9 2006 Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> 4.1.0-3
- make ppc32 TLS PIC code sequences compatible with secure plt (#184446)
(Richard Henderson and myself)
* Sat Mar 4 2006 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> 4.1.0-2
-- update from -gcc-4_1-branch (-r111570:111697)
+- update from gcc-4_1-branch (-r111570:111697)
- PRs c++/26291, libgfortran/26136, libgfortran/26423, libgfortran/26464,
libstdc++/26526, rtl-optimization/26345, target/19061, target/26453
- handle DW_CFA_val_{offset,offset_sf,expression} in the libgcc{,_s} unwinder
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 0ab0f01..e35f56a 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-cc39dd702c70d0a784c7ecdedbb503b7 gcc-4.1.0-20060304.tar.bz2
+40cb6ec0b50a317a12929f270a0d7c02 gcc-4.1.0-20060328.tar.bz2
next reply other threads:[~2026-06-29 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-29 12:22 Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2026-06-29 12:22 [rpms/gcc] rhel-f41-base: 4.1.0-4 Jakub Jelinek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178273574095.1.15349540257315649139.rpms-gcc-6a07d2500b69@fedoraproject.org \
--to=jakub@fedoraproject.org \
--cc=git-commits@fedoraproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox